Mumbai : The lawyer of Gujarat IPS officer Rajkumar Pandian, whose discharge in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh alleged fake encounter case has been challenged in the Bombay High Court, today alleged in the court that he was framed up by the CBI.
Pandian had a stelar reird and he was the “main” officer who had taken on fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim and the ISI of Pakistan when he was with the IB, senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, his lawyer, told the court.
The Central Bureau of Investigation, which took over the encounter case from the Gujarat CID in 2010, framed Pandian by fabricating evidence, he alleged.
“I (Pandian) have unimpeachable documentary evidence to prove that I was not in Hyderabad on the day of the alleged abduction,” Jethmalani contended today.
As per the CBI, Sohrabuddin, a gangster with alleged terror links, his wife Kausar Bi and his aide Tulsiram Prajapati were abducted by the Gujarat police on the night of November 22-23, 2005 while they were travelling from Hyderabad to Sangli in a private bus.
“I had taken a flight from Hyderabad to Ahmedabad on November 23, 2005…. However, the CBI claims I never took that flight and instead sent constable Ajay Parmar to Ahmedabad on my ticket as a cover-up,” the lawyer said. It was an international flight of Air India, where every passenger’s ID card would have been checked, he said.
The CBI presented, as evidence, the custom declaration form submitted at the Hyderabad airport, filled in Pandian’s name but bearing Parmar’s signature, Jethmalani said.
The agency claimed that it proved that Parmar took the flight on Pandian’s ticket to help him cover his tracks. “This is a fabricated document. I am a victim…. The victim of false investigation by the CBI,” Jethmalani said.
“I was the main officer who fought Dawood Ibrahim and ISI (during a stint as SP with the Intelligence Bureau). I have an unimpeachable record, and yet, the CBI is trying to undermine me like this,” the lawyer said.
According to Pandian, he was in Hyderabad on November 21-22, 2005 to inspect the site of a bomb blast that had taken place near the city in October that year, and he had nothing to do with the alleged abduction of Sohrabuddin.
Due to change of assignment, the matter has been taken away from Justice Revati Mohite-Dere as the board has changed and the case will be heard by another judge from the forthcoming week.