The ministry claimed it has no information available. Since BCCI has not been declared as public authority under the RTI Act, hence the RTI application could not be transferred to the BCCI.
New Delhi : Why should cricket controlling body of the country, the BCCI, be not answerable under the RTI Act in light of various judicial orders and a recent law commission report, the Central Information Commission has directed the sports body and the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports to explain.
“It is the responsibility of the CIC to put an end to this prolonging uncertainty which makes the BCCI non-transparent and unaccountable without any moral backing and legal reasoning,” Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu said.
The matter came before him as Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports did not give a satisfactory response to an RTI applicant, Geeta Rani, who had sought to know the provisions and guidelines under which the BCCI has been representing India and selecting players for the country.
The ministry claimed it has no information available and since BCCI has not been declared as public authority under the RTI Act, hence the RTI application could not be transferred to the BCCI.
After perusing records presented by the ministry, Acharyulu said it becomes important to hear whether the BCCI is answerable under the RTI Act.
“Her question whether it is ‘a Team India’ or ‘Team BCCI’, raises an issue of exclusive authorisation of the BCCI to select team for India. This exclusiveness of authorisation created a monopoly in favour of federal body of sports for cricket called the BCCI,” he said.