Referendum on EU splits British society

Referendum on EU splits British society

FPJ BureauUpdated: Thursday, May 30, 2019, 02:51 PM IST
article-image

With barely a week to go for the referendum on whether to quit the European Union (EU), the Britons appear to be completely in a state of confusion. During last week the Brexit has gained nearly four points more than Remain, enforcing the belief that the people are in favour of quitting EU but skepticism has also started running high about the future of United Kingdom.

The feeling that Britain eventually would be the ultimate loser has gripped the psyche of the people. Some even have started blaming David Cameron, the British prime minister, for creating this situation. They feel that he should not have promised for a referendum two years back. The academics, intellectuals, workers and even Asian migrants, feel that Britain must quit the EU. However both the camps stick to their arguments citing the welfare of the country.

There is a lurking apprehension among the academics and intellectuals that referendums never do good to the country. This is the reason why federal plebiscites are outlawed under the German constitution. Even Margaret Thatcher, citing Clement Attlee, once referred to referendums as “a splendid weapon for demagogues and dictators.”  Usually the referendum tends to funnel a multitude of different protest votes into a single, sometimes revolutionary, force that vilifies or ridicules the established institutions and decisions of state.

By holding referendum Cameron has opened a Pandora ’s Box, making it even harder to see any good outcome, whatever the result. Britain is facing an identity crisis. Irrespective of the nature of the verdict, whether Remain wins or Leave trounces, the political establishment and system will cease to be the same as what it is today. Inevitably a major transformation and realignment of political forces will take place in Britain which will ultimately have an impact on the balance of power in the region and is likely to change the global equations.

Cameron is using his best skill to scare people by focusing on the reality of what life would be like outside the EU and the world’s largest trading market. As a warning to the old people, who have shifted their loyalty to the Leave, he says, the so-called triple-lock that guarantees annual increases in state pensions, ring fenced spending on the NHS, free TV licenses and bus passes for pensioners, as well as defence spending would all be under threat, implying that they would be deprived of these benefits. Annual state pension increases are guaranteed by the triple lock, which ensures they rise in line with whichever is higher: earnings, inflation or 2.5%. But if Brexit happened, this commitment would be in doubt.

A desperate Cameron is also trying to rope in senior Labour leaders. Just ahead of the D-day, leading Labour figures, including leader Jeremy Corbyn, London mayor Sadiq Khan, former premier Gordon Brown and former home secretary Alan Johnson would be given centre stage in the Remain campaign, so that they could appeal directly to Labour followers. He called on them not to use the 23 June vote as a chance to punish him or the Tories but to support what is a huge coalition from the left and right that is backing continued EU membership.

The vote was “more important than a general election,” Cameron said. He added: “They are voting for a generation, for a lifetime. It is about their children, and grandchildren. What I would say to Labour voters is, look at the scale, look at the range behind Stronger In. Referendum has split all the political parties in UK. If the Tories are vertically split, with at least three senior ministerial colleagues of Cameron openly going against him, so is the case with Labour Party. In fact a large number of Conservative leaders have turned hostile to Cameron and have even raised the issue of his resignation. Prime Minister David Cameron, the person who gave the Tories their first Commons majority since 1992 faces the prospect of losing his office. “Leave” voting Conservative MPS are waiting for Cameron’s action, with others admitting that both ways, he will have to vacate the office. Even Jeremy Corbyn has not been able to keep his united. It is also split.

What has been really interesting to watch is that the referendum has divided the British society into rich and poor block. Barely two days back, British MP Priti Patel alleged “some in Westminster do not understand the pressure that millions of Britons face.” The Remain campaigners often seem to speak from privilege; representing a political class which only knows the benefit of cheap labour. Leave supporters argue that continuing with the EU will destroy the UK’s economy.

Last week the office of the National Statistics revealed that the net migration figure rose to 333,000 in 2015. It is now predicted that the population will surge by over four million in the next decade. Almost 700,000 school children have a parent who is a citizen of another European country. British MP Priti Patel alleged that the campaigners of Remain represent a political class which only knows the benefits of cheap labour. The government must think beyond the referendum and explain how it is going to manage the contentious issue of migration.

Till a week back the Brexit campaign was trailing behind, but it has substantially gained in recent days notwithstanding USA and Obama putting their weight behind the Remain campaign. The primary reason for increase in support for Brexit is the fear of migration boost. It is feared that the huge population of refugees which entered into the EU in the wake of the Syrian crisis may sneak into UK if the Remain wins. Most of the EU countries would prefer to offload the refugee burden. Significantly the Asian migrants also do not intend to allow the EU migrants to enter into UK. They would endanger their financial interest.

Consistently a feeling is gripping the voters that Cameron and other pro-European leaders who are close to USA, do not care about the effects of mass migration on working families, as they are rich. The prominent Conservative leaders allege that the luxurious lifestyle of the Remain leaders have insulated them from the impact of the rising immigration on the daily lives of millions of Britons. The apprehension that migration will rise if Remain wins is not unfounded. It will be tough to keep the promise to cut migration because it would be impossible to control the border. The issue of open border is gaining much importance. Britishers believe that the government must evolve a mechanism to control the border. The issue of raising an Army of EU has also created confusion.

Britain is now in a state of shock. Even the people from Scotland are in a situation of fix. Business confidence is plummeting, authority of some of the nation’s most important institutions is taking a hammering  like Parliament itself, whose constitutional right to take decisions on behalf of the nation has been undermined by the  referendum. The situation has shaken the confidence level of the Britons. For them the identity and sovereignty of Britain is at stake. Remains hold that a vote to leave the European Union would trigger an immediate recession, lower the GDP, affect UK output to the tune of more than 1 per cent a year for the next decade; put millions of jobs at risk, plunge sterling and erode real incomes. The Bank of England shares the view that membership of the EU has been substantially beneficial to the UK economy.

As against this, it is the nationalist pride that has been prompting the Britons to opt for Leave. They hold; “UK is the nation of Shakespeare and Newton, of Faraday and Rutherford, of Gladstone and Churchill. Our language is spoken by 1.5 billion people and is the international standard for science, engineering, medicine, on the internet, in modern film and media, in commerce and law. We have more reach and reputation and influence than any country of 60 million has a right to expect.”

The UK, once we vote to leave, will negotiate a new relationship with the EU. The Britishers were never so vertically split emotionally.

RECENT STORIES

Editorial: A Fraudulent Messiah

Editorial: A Fraudulent Messiah

Editorial: Eliminating Scourge Of Maoists

Editorial: Eliminating Scourge Of Maoists

Analysis: The Question Of Employment In An Election Year

Analysis: The Question Of Employment In An Election Year

Analysis: 2024 Polls — 370 Seats For BJP Or 272 For Opposition?

Analysis: 2024 Polls — 370 Seats For BJP Or 272 For Opposition?

Editorial: Trump, Sex, And Payoff

Editorial: Trump, Sex, And Payoff