Indians got freedom on August 15, 1947 and responsibility on January 26, 1950. Freedom and responsibility go together and are two sides of the same coin. One cannot exist without the other. Being free means not being ruled by anyone else. It establishes our sovereignty. Being responsible means setting the rules on how we will conduct ourselves as a society. These voluntary rules have to be codified from the beginning, and we take an oath that we will abide by these rules. The rules also include the rights of the people and their responsibilities. This codification is the foundational document of our republic, whose final draft was formally adopted by the constituent assembly on November 26, 1949. That is why we celebrate November 26 as our Constitution Day. In about two months, our Constitution will be 73 years old. It is one of the finest Constitutions in the world. Its formation benefitted from all other Constitutions that preceded it, such as the ones from the United States and France, which are older democracies. The United Kingdom does not have a written Constitution.
Our Constitution is not merely a synthesis or a “copy paste” of those other documents that came before it. It distilled what were some of their best features and incorporated all of them into something which is uniquely Indian. The chairman of the drafting committee, also called the chief architect of India’s Constitution, was Dr Ambedkar, whose speech of November 26, 1946 is worth reading again and again. That speech is the culmination of the drafting process, which took nearly two years and intense, free, and frank debates. Those debates too are worth reading, not just for scholars of history, but for all who care about India’s sovereignty, its democracy and the republic.
All the debates of modern times, whether they are about the uniform civil code, whether India should have a Hindu ethos-based Constitution, whether the discussion is about the balance of power between the Centre and the States, or about how much protection should be given to minorities, or about the limits to freedom of expression and so on — all these subjects have been thoroughly discussed during those debates. Of course, the Constitution debates did not pronounce a final word on all debates for all times to come. Even then, when it was drafted, the Constitution did not represent a compromise, but a consensus. That consensus will last a long time due to the process that drove it. However, our Constitution has not been frozen for ever. It has been amended more than a hundred times in the past 73 years. This does not mean that it was flawed at the beginning; it means it is a living document, and has enough flexibility to accommodate changing times, and the changing preferences of society. As Professor S N Mishra wrote recently, despite those many amendments, the key amendments are only 10, roughly the same that the United States has seen in two and half centuries.
What would one consider the most important part of the Constitution? It has got to be the fundamental rights. These are not god-given, nor do they come from any scriptures. As Dr Ambedkar said, these are the gifts we have given to ourselves. But these rights are not absolute rights as enshrined in the American Constitution. They can be qualified by the State. The most essential rights are the right to life, freedom of expression, freedom of mobility and the right to not be discriminated against. Parliament of course has the power to amend the Constitution, including constraining some rights. This, however, is subject to judicial review. Parliament’s power to amend does not meant that it can alter the basic structure of the Constitution itself. This was the famous 1973 judgment of the Supreme Court, a verdict which passed with the thinnest of majority. Amendments (such as the recent one granting a reservation quota for economically weaker sections or EWS) are possible, but Parliament cannot pass laws which go against the basic structure doctrine. Also, our Constitution gives the Supreme Court the right to review every law passed by Parliament. In this respect it is not Parliament which is supreme (as in the UK) with unlimited rights to alter the Constitution — the Constitution is superior to Parliament. This is an important feature and that is why many politicians call the Indian Constitution the Holy Book of our democracy.
Another important aspect of the Constitution is the protection of minorities. There are abundant safeguards to protect minorities against the arbitrary use of power by the majority. As Dr Ambedkar said, the majority has a duty toward minorities, as the latter have chosen to be under majority rule. One must remember that the ultimate minority is the individual. And individual freedoms and rights must be protected at all costs. The Constitution gives primacy to individual rights, not collective rights. This was a major debating point — whether collective identity like village councils (or khap panchayats) would supersede the right of the individual. Dr Amebdkar was firm on this point — that even though village communities have survived for millennia, one cannot romanticise the village republic; indeed, they have led to the ruination of India, he asserted. The Constitution puts the individual’s right above everything else, and certainly above collective rights. This is an ongoing tussle.
Finally, we must recollect the prophetic words of Dr Ambedkar from that speech of November 26. He said we have a contradiction, that in political life we have equality (one person one vote) but in social and economic life we have inequality. If we don’t address this, he warned, those who suffer from increasing inequality and deprivation will blow up the magnificent edifice of democracy. His words were spoken in 1949, almost 20 years before the first explosion of Naxal activity. If anything, in the past 70 years inequality has worsened in every conceivable dimension — be it income, wealth, gender, access to good quality education and healthcare and now even digital inequality. The founding principles of our Constitution lay stress on justice, liberty, fraternity and equality. The latter does not mean perfect equality, but at least it means reducing the widening inequality in society. We must rededicate ourselves to those founding principles as we celebrate one of the most glorious Constitutions in the world.
Dr Ajit Ranade is a noted economist. Syndicate: The Billion Press. Email: editor@thebillionpress.org
